| |
On-Site Agenda
Final Attendee Roster
Monday, 6 March 2006
Tutorials:
How to Improve the Effectiveness,
Efficiency, and Integration of Test & Evaluation (T&E) and Modeling and
Simulation (M&S), by Dr. Mark J. Kiemele, Air Academy Associates
Putting the Missions and Means Framework
(MMF) to Work to Drive Analysis - Getting to the "So What" by Asking the
Right Questions about the Mission and Generating Complete and Relevant
Answers, by LTC Britt Bray, USA(Ret), Dynamics Research Corporation,
Inc. and Mr. Bill Yeakel, President, ORSA Corporation
Tuesday, 8 March 2005
Modeling, Simulation and Testing: Collision
Course or Happy Marriage?, by Hon Philip E. Coyle, III, former Director,
Operational Test & Evaluation (DOT&E), OSD
Panel: Non-Technical
Obstacles to Technical Obstacles to Effective M&S Connectivity in Effective
M&S Connectivity in Support of T&E:
Panel Chair: Mr. John Illgen, Northrop Grumman Simulation
Technologies
Panel: DT&E’s Perspectives - “Making M&S and T&E Better Partners”:
Panel Chair:
- Mr. Chris DiPetto,
Special Assistant, Systems Engineering, Office of the Under Secretary
of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics Technologies
Panelist (Government Representatives):
- Dr. George Kailiwai, III,
AFFTC Technical Advisor
- Mr. Thomas Berard, Director,
White Sands Missile Range
Panelist (Industry Representatives):
- Mr. Steven E. Cameron, Senior
Manager, Modeling & Simulation Infrastructure, Boeing Analysis, Modeling,
Simulation & Experimentation
- Mr. James A. Hazlett, Director,
Mission Profiling, Mission Innovation, Raytheon Integrated Defense Systems
An LFT&E Perspective on Making M&S and T&E Better Partners, by Dr. Lowell Tonnessen,
Institute for Defense Analyses
Modeling the FCS Brigade Combat Team in a Stability and Reconstruction Operations
Mission – Implications for T&E Planning, by LTC (R) Britt E. Bray, Dynamics Research Corp.
T&E Transformation - "We Don’t Need a More Formal Invitation",
by Mr. William P. Yeakel, President, ORSA Corporation
Return to the top
Wednesday, 8 March 2006
DMSO Panel:
Panelist:
- Challenges For M&S in Army Test
and Evaluation, Mr. Roe Mirabelle, Chief, Technical Support Division
(TSD), Modeling & Simulation
Military Services Perspectives:
COMOPTEVFOR Perspectives
on Modeling & Simulation in Operational Test & Evaluation, RADM Bill
McCarthy, USN, COMOPTEVFOR
The Air Force’s Perspective,
Mr. Jack Manclark, AF/Test & Evaluation Directorate
M&S Support to FCS
M&S Studies in the Context of the T&E and Acquisition:
Diagnosis of the Problem: What
Prior Studies Have to Say, by Dr. James E. Coolahan, Program Manager
and
Modeling and Simulation Group Supervisor, National Security Analysis Department
"Open Air Testing vs. Modeling and Simulation: At last Peaceful Coexistence?", by
RADM Charles "Bert" Johnston, USN (Ret), Vice President & General Manager, Wyle Laboratories
Live-Virtual-Constructive Distributed
Environments in Support of Test and Evaluation, by Major Kelly A. Greene,
Ph.D., Air Force Agency for Modeling and Simulation
Open Technology Development & Testing,
by Mr, John Scott, OSD, AS&C Consultant
Modeling and Simulation of System of Systems The History of the LPD 17 PRA Testbed, by
Mr. Vincent M. Ortiz, AVW Technologies
Return to the top
Thursday, 9 March 2006
Using the Missions and Means Framework to Generate Cost-Effective Live-Fire Test
and Evaluation Strategies, by Dr. Martha K. Nelson, Franklin & Marshall College, Department of Business, Organizations,
and Society & Mr. Dennis C. Bely, US Army Research Laboratory, Survivability/Lethality, Analysis Directorate
Modeling and Simulation to Advance Test and Evaluation, by Dr. Sheldon Tieszen &
Dr. Lou Gritzo, Sandia National Laboratories
Track 1:
T&E / M&S Architecture:
- Test and Training Enabling Architecture
(TENA) Offers Range Interoperability and Resource Reuse Solutions for
Test and Training Ranges, by Mr. Gene Hudgins, TENA User Support Lead
-
A Case Study of T&E Data Supporting A Simulation by Mr. Vincent M.
Ortiz, AVW Technologies
Policy Proposals:
- 27 Steps to Success: The DoD Acquisition
M&S Master Plan, by Mr. Fred Myers, OUSD (AT&L) DS/SE, Chair, Acquisition
M&S Working Group
- “No More Second Opinions: Organizing DoD M&S Within the Acquisition Cycle”
by Mr. James F. O’Bryon, The O’Bryon Group
- Optimizing Cost & Time Effectiveness of Test & Evaluation Using Knowledge-Based
Simulations, by Dr. Keith S. Bradley, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Track 2:
(VVA) "V,V&A" Issues to Make T&E/M&S Work Effectively:
- LPD 17 PRA Testbed VV&A Database:
A Disciplined Approach for VV&A, by Mr. Vincent M. Ortiz, AVW Technologies
Examples of Attempts to Get Mutual Support Between T&E and M&S:
- Dual Thrust Modified Smokey Sam
for Low Cost Testing and Simulation, by Mr. William R. Taylor, Tech
Advisor for EOCM, AFRL/SNJW
- Integration of Transport Modeling
with Test and Evaluation in CBR Building Protection Programs, by Mr.
James Risser, Battelle
M&S Studies in the Context of the T&E and Acquisition:
- CAW use of M&S in Support
of Maritime HLD/HLS/ATFP Test and Training Exercises, by Mr. Arman
Tchoubineh, NAWC WD, Pt Mugu, CA
- Commericial Air Services: Live
Test Assets for Electronic Warfare, by Mr. Stan Ulkoski, PMA-207D2
Aircraft Operation Manager, J.F. Taylor, Inc., NAVAIR Support Contractor
Return to the top
|