|
Tuesday, March 11, 2003
SESSION 1: Plenary Session
U.S. DoD Insensitive Munitions
and Energetic Materials Program Perspective by Anthony Melita, OUSD
(AT&L)
Future Direction: U.S. Navy’s
Insensitive Munitions Office (NOSSA N6) by Donald Porada, USN NOSSA
Insensitive Munitions and
the U.S. Army by Ken Duncan, TACOM-ARDEC
SESSION 2: Programs & Systems I
Development of IM Grenade
Submunitions by Donald Geiss, Jr., TACOM-ARDEC
A System Approach to IM for
Solid Rocket Motors--Composite Cases & Reduced Sensitivity Propellants
by Paul Johnsen, NAWC and Michael Fisher, NMIC
Evaluation of Sympathetic
Detonation Shielding Concepts for Ship-Stowed Munitions by Edward
J. O’Connor, NSWC
SESSION 3: Formulation I
CL-20 PAX Explosives Formulation
Development, Characterization, and Testing by Steven Nicolich, TACOM-ARDEC
Development of a Novel High
Blast / High Fragmentation Melt Pour Explosive by John Niles, TACOM-ARDEC
SESSION 4: Policy I
The French I.M. Policy 10
Years After by Patrick Kernen and Patrick Lamy, DGA/IPE
Wednesday, March 12, 2003
SESSION 5A: Synthesis
The Development of an
Alternative Route to Triaminotrinitrobenzene by Dr. Stephen Velarde,
ATK Alliant Techsystems, Thiokol Propulsion
SESSION 5b: Policy II
Towards an IM European Manufacturers
Grouping by Ron Scott, Club Murat
French Unit Risk Assignment
for IM Offers Visible Logistical Gains an Experience with a Muratized
Guided Weapon by Patrick Kernen, DGA/IPE
Navy Insensitive Munitions
Prioritization Methodology by Robert Maline, Naval Ordnance Safety
& Security
Cost Benefit Analysis Studies
of the Introduction of Insensitive Munitions: Is IM Cost of Ownership
Cheaper? by Pascal Marchandin, (NIMIC)
SESSION 6a: Test and Evaluation
Insensitive Munitions Analytical
Compliance System (I-MACS) Concept by George Thompson, Chemical Compliance
Systems, Inc.
Recommendations For Shaped
Charge Jet, Munitions Test Procedure Part 2 : Gun Propellant by Frédéric
Peugeot, NIMIC
Topics of Interest: Ageing
& Cook-off by Dr. Michael Sharp, TSO Energetic Materials
SESSION 6b: Modeling
What’s new on Club Murat CBA
software? by Jean-Pierre Mazer, Club MURAT
South African Threat Hazard
Analysis Approach Proposal by Henco Bezuidenhout, Naschem (Denel)
Numerical Simulation of
Reaction Violence to Cook-off Experiments by David Desailly, SNPE
CRB
Insensitive Munitions Programmes
Overview by Andrew Wilson, BAE Systems Ordnance Systems, Inc.
A Comparison of Techniques
for Modeling XDT in Explosives and Propellants by Edward J. O’Connor,
NSWC Dahlgren Division
SESSION 7a: Processing
A New Energetic Prepolymer -
Structurally Stable PGN Prepolymer by Edward J. O'Conner, NSWC Dahlgren
Division
SESSION 7b: Formulation II
Advantage of Less Sensitive
LTC Gun Propellant by Dr. Dietmar Mueller, Fraunhofer Institut Chemische
Technologie (ICT)
Insensitive Energetics for
Insensitive Munitions by Richard Wild, Diehl Munitionssysteme GmbH
& Co. K.G.
Insensitive Munition
Tests for Artillery Fuzes by Jason Fitzgerald-Smith, JUNGHANS Feinwerktechnik
SESSION 8a: Formulation III
Insensitive Munitions (IM)
Melt Pour Explosive Development by Pamela Ferlazzo, TACOM-ARDEC
ARDEC Explosives Development:
Melt/Pour Explosives Containing TNAZ by Michael Dewey, ATK-Thiokol
Propulsion
Improved Insensitive Hytemp/DOA
Bonded HMX and RDX Mixtures by Paste Process by Karl P. Rudolf, Diehl
Munitionssysteme GmbH&CO, KG
SESSION 8b: Test & Evaluation II
Investigation of IM Benefits
for Navy Applications by Dr. Patrick N. Carlton, Orion International
Technology, Inc.
Thursday, March 13, 2003
SESSION 9: Energetic Ingredients
Recent Advances in the
DSTO Evaluation of Fox-7 by Dr. Ian Lochert, DSTO
Assessment of Australian
Insensitive RDX by Dr. Ian Lochert, DSTO
Studies of the Crystallization
of CL-20 by Scott Hamilton, ATK-Thiokol
SESSION 10: Programs & Systems II
KS22a The Insensitive High
Explosive for Hard Target Defeat Applications by Dr. Werner Arnold,
TDW GmbH
Process of Transferring New
Energetic Materials from Concept to Production at Holston Army Ammunition
Plant by Melissa Hobbs, BAE Systems Ordnance Systems, Inc.
|