Accession Number : AD1003609


Title :   Circadian Countermeasures in the High Arctic during Summer


Descriptive Note : Technical Report


Corporate Author : Defence Research and Development - Toronto Research Centre Toronto, Ontario


Personal Author(s) : Paul,Michel A ; Love,Ryan J ; Hawton,Andrea M ; McCreary,Donald R ; Brett,Kaighley D ; Arendt,Josephine


Full Text : http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/1003609.pdf


Report Date : 01 Nov 2014


Pagination or Media Count : 48


Abstract : Background. We have previously shown that the 24 hours of daily sunlight in the high Arctic during the summer provides a good environment for misaligning the physiological circadian pattern with the work-sleep schedule of the individual. As a result, there is a prevalence of sleep difficulty in the summer, with a general reduction in both the quantity and quality of sleep obtained among residents in the summer vs. the winter (Paul, M. A., Love, R. J., Hawton, A. M.et al. Melatonin production, sleep patterns and modeled performance effectiveness in subjects in the high Arctic. In. DRDC-RDDC-2014-R15, DRDC Toronto Research Centre, 2014).Methods. Subjects were 15 CAF personnel (11 males and 4 females, age range of 19 to 47 years, with mean age and standard deviation of 28.3 8.3 years) who had arrived at CFS Alert at least one week prior to the study which encompassed 21 days from May 23rd to June 13th, 2014. During this period there were 24 hours of daylight. Subjects wore motion-detection devices (Actigraphs) to obtain objective sleep data, and completed questionnaires regarding sleep difficulty and psychosocial parameters at the beginning and end of the study. After a 7 day period of baseline Actigraph data, salivary melatonin assays were collected 2 hourly for 24 hours while the subjects remained in dim light conditions. Based on the melatonin profiles and sleep questionnaire histories, 13 subjects were prescribed melatonin and given advice about light exposure. After a 10 day intervention period, a 24hour melatonin profile was repeated under identical conditions. Treatment effects were evaluated using the questionnaire data, actigraphic data, and endogenous melatonin profiles. Results. A small benefit of exogenous melatonin consumption was observed in 73 of the subjects. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the collective quantity or quality of sleep obtained by the subjects following the treatment.


Descriptors :   Arctic regions , Circadian rhythms , Countermeasures , sleep , Fatigue(Physiology) , Melatonin , Cognitive impairment , Military personnel


Distribution Statement : APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE